Rising
food prices would seem, logically, to motivate consumers to seek out less
expensive foods. But some recent studies have shown a significant number of
consumers heading in the opposite direction—a trend that is turning out to be
good news for some processors of well-established food
brands.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture has forecast an
increase in food prices of 5% to 6% this year, which would be the largest
annual increase since 1990. The USDA also predicted a 4% to 5% increase in food
prices in 2009, which, if true, will make it the third straight year with an
increase of at least 4%.
This situation is creating an
opportunity for processors of retail food, because it’s driving many consumers
to cut back on visits to restaurants. This is a main reason why most major food
retailers showed same-store sales growth over the first quarter of 2008, while
restaurant sales are stagnant or declining—even though the inflation rate for
food away from home (4.1%) is lower than for food at home
(5.5%).
According to a report by Holland’s Rabobank, which
specializes in financial services to the food and agriculture industry, a
“barbell effect” is occurring among food shoppers. Many of them are going for either
low prices at one extreme, or high value at the other. The high-value end of
the “barbell” could consist of several attributes, including quality,
healthiness and convenience.
In general, analysts say, the
quest for high value is benefiting food companies with high-profile brands,
because they’re able to raise prices to cover their ingredient costs without
driving consumers to lower-cost alternatives like private
label.
“There’s no oversupply of Oreos, so the packaged-food
companies have been able to offset enough inflation to post profit growth,”
Edward Jones analyst Matt Arnold told the
Wall Street
Journal.
Kraft Foods, maker of Oreos, announced
that its revenue for the second quarter of 2008 rose 21% over the same period
last year, resulting in an income gain of 9.1%. Much of that revenue gain came
as a result of an average price increase of 7% for the company’s products,
which resulted in a sales decline of only 1%.
Similarly,
Heinz reported growth in the most recent fiscal quarter of 15% in sales and 14%
in earnings.
However, other companies are running into
problems. Tyson Foods, hit hard by increases in feed costs, posted a 92% loss
in income for the last quarter, even though revenue was up 3.5%. Most of the
income loss was caused by a $44 million operating loss in Tyson’s chicken
business. Part of the problem was an oversupply of meat, poultry and other
unprocessed or minimally processed foods.