Food and Drug Packaging
  Home
  Subscribe
  Subscribe FREE to Food Packaging Insights Newsletter
  Subscription Customer Service
  Online
  Business News
  Blog
  Key Issues / Trends
  Product Spotlights
  Sponsored Products
  Technology
  Current Issue
  Cover Story
  Features
  Departments
  New Packages
  Advertiser Index
  Resources
  Archives
  Buyers Guide
  Classified Ads
  Market Research
  Career Center
  White Papers
  2008 Pack Expo eDaily News
  2008 Packaging Machinery Design Gallery
  Events
  Events Calendar
  Packaging That Sells Conference
  FBP Info
  Contact Us
  About Us
  Media Kit
  Reprints
  List Rental
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies

Food Packaging Insights Newsletter

Click Here to Subscribe FREE to Food Packaging Insights Newsletter

Food Packaging Insights - October 10, 2008

October 9, 2008

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



Simple is best in nutrition info

by Pan Demetrakakes
Executive Editor


As food processors, regulators, nutritionists and others puzzle over how best to deliver nutritional information to consumers, the answer may be in one word: Simplify.

The multiplicity of information given to consumers on food labels, both in America and abroad, is confusing many of them to the point where they’re disregarding it, according to some recent studies.

The biggest problem is that many consumers simply don’t have the knowledge to interpret correctly the information on the labels. For instance, a survey of British consumers by the European Food Information Council showed that 35% incorrectly believe that children need more calories than adults—misinformation which is significant in the face of increasing child obesity. That study also showed that only one in four shoppers actually looked for nutrition information on food packaging in supermarkets. Another British study, by the Food Standards Agency (FSA), showed consumer confusion over understanding information about portion sizes and interpreting and using numerical information.

The answer may be to boil down information to a single, easily understood piece of data. That’s already being done to some extent in the UK with the “traffic light” symbols used on food packaging by some retailers for store brands. The plan assigns red, yellow and green symbols to foods based on nutritional standards. Studies show good awareness of the plan, although the FSA survey revealed some confusion over the meaning of the symbols.

A University of Washington professor is putting forward a plan he calls the “nutrient rich foods approach.” Adam Drewnowski, director of the university’s Center for Public Health Nutrition, outlined an approach that would classify foods by the amount of vitamins and other positive nutrients they supply, versus their calories per serving. Foods that were heavy on positive nutrients and light on calories would get high ratings, which could be expressed as a number or symbol.

Drewnowski presented this approach on behalf of the Nutrient Rich Foods Coalition, a coalition of 12 food commodity associations like the Grain Foods Foundation and the Florida Department of Citrus. A study by the coalition showed that 54% of consumers were overwhelmed by nutrition information, and 78% were looking for a simple, practical tool for nutrition advice.


TOP DEVELOPMENTS

U.S. mandatory traceability system proposed
To help improve food safety in the U.S., the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is considering a mandatory traceability system. While some produce firms have voluntary traceability programs, lawmakers are saying that a mandatory program is overdue and would help U.S. regulators improve safety and restore consumer confidence, which has plummeted because of contamination events with tomatoes, pet food and peanut butter. David Acheson, the FDA’s associate commissioner for food protection, says that he does not believe the FDA has explicit authority to mandate a tracking system or a specific technology (such as radio frequency identification).

IoPP to host REACH webinar
The Institute of Packaging Professionals will be hosting a webinar to discuss the potential effects of Europe’s REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals) regulations. The one-hour webinar will take place Oct. 17 at 10 a.m. CDT and costs $95 U.S. for members and $105 for non-members. The speaker will be Sebastien Louvion, an associate with Mayer Brown Int’l, a Brussels, Belgium-based legal partnership. To register, visit www.iopp.org/webseminars, or call 630-696-4010.


NEW PACKAGES

For Mars, green is the new pink
Mars Inc. is going green for Valentine’s Day. Its iconic M&Ms candy will appear with striking green-themed graphics in a promotional version starting next January. The graphics center on “Ms. Green,” a vampish anthropomorphized  M&M’s piece introduced in 1997. The 8- and 14-ounce pouches will contain all green M&M’s. Mars is betting that the almost-all-green packages will stand out among the sea of pink and red in Valentine’s-related displays.







European snack in peelable can
A healthy snack marketed in Western Europe is packaged in metal cans with peelable lids from the European subsidiary of Crown Holdings. Maïs & Fruit, from France’s Bonduelle Group, is sweet corn mixed with either pineapple or a mango and papaya blend. The product comes in 130-milliliter bowl-shaped cans that feature Crown’s PeelSeam peelable lids and a plastic spoon, sold with two bowls in a paperboard sleeve. Maïs and Fruit was introduced in the summer in Holland and is now also marketed in France, Italy, Spain and Germany.


|PrintEmail

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.



















BNP Media
© 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy