Costlier food drives ‘barbell
effect’by Pan Demetrakakes
Executive EditorRising food prices would seem, logically, to motivate
consumers to seek out less expensive foods. But some recent studies have shown
a significant number of consumers heading in the opposite direction.
A report by Holland’s Rabobank,
which specializes in financial services to the food and agriculture industry,
referred to a “barbell effect” among food shoppers: The majority of them are
going for either low prices, at one extreme, or high value at the other. The
high-value end of the “barbell” could consist of several attributes, including
quality, healthiness and convenience.
Buying costlier, higher-quality
foods may seem counterintuitive when food prices are rising, but it makes
sense, at least over the short term. The Rabobank report notes that many
consumers are increasing their at-home food budget by cutting down on meals
away from home. This is one reason why most major food retailers showed
same-store sales growth over the first quarter of 2008, while restaurant sales
are stagnant or declining—even though the inflation rate for food away from
home (4.1%) is lower than for food at home (5.5%).
In a survey for Whole Foods Market,
79% of respondents said they did not want to compromise the quality of foods
they buy regardless of rising prices, and 70% said they are buying the same
amount of natural/organic foods they always have. They survey, conducted by
Harris Interactive, also found 67% would prefer natural/organic foods if their
prices were comparable to those of regular products.
The Rabobank report also notes that
many food processors have so far been protected from the full impact of
ingredient price increases by long-term contracts with suppliers. As these
contracts expire and processors are forced to pass along increases, consumer
buying patterns may change.
The food companies that succeed in
making price increases “stick”—that is, without driving consumers to lower-cost
alternatives like private label—will be those with unique, hard-to-replicate
products. Analysts say this is why companies like Kraft Foods and General Mills
have enjoyed good recent financial performances, despite the general inflation
in the food sector.
NEW PACKAGES
Hydrox
makes a comebackHydrox cookies, an Oreo competitor that
disappeared from store shelves years ago, is being resurrected briefly for its
100th anniversary. Kellogg, which bought the chocolate sandwich cookie in 2001,
brought it back in a limited edition starting in late August. The film overwrap
features a window to reveal the product, plus graphic elements that appeal to
nostalgia: a callout with “100th Anniversary Limited Edition,” the years
1908-2008 and the logo of Sunshine Bakers, the brand’s original developers.
Similac in
rectangular containerPackaging for Similac powdered baby formula from
Abbott Nutrition has been redesigned for maximal convenience. Features of the
new plastic rigid container include indented sides for a one-handed grip, a
hinged lid whose underside holds a scoop, rounded corners for easier scooping,
and a peel-back label with additional information and a Spanish translation.
The new package, available in 23.2- and 34-ounce sizes, takes up 33% less shelf
space than cans of comparable size.